Courts often use a more concrete approach to calculating damages in contract cases, comparing the value that the specific asset or obligation would have had with its actual value after the breach (and not to the assets as a whole). For the purposes of the market value approach (in which the service consists of marketable goods), the amount of damages is determined by the difference between the market value of the goods in the form obtained and the market value they would have had if the goods had complied with the requirements of the contract. For the purposes of the “One for All” rule, the plaintiff must assert all damages in a lawsuit. If not all damages were suffered at the time the action was brought, the plaintiff must include a claim for anticipated losses in that action. Misrepresentation and error are different legal concepts in contract law; they also lead to different corrective measures. An error presupposes the absence of consensus and cancels the contract from the outset, whereas a contract induced by a false declaration is valid but voidable. If the debtor decides to comply with the contract, it may, in appropriate circumstances, obtain an order requiring the creditor to cooperate. Of course, his own obligation of performance then remains, but the delay on his part does not constitute a mora debitoris caused by the fault of the creditor. The debtor`s duty of care in respect of the goods to be delivered (if any) is reduced. Once the creditor falls to Mora, the debtor is only liable for Dolus or Culpa Lata. In addition, the principle of the obligation of perpetuation applies here: the creditor bears the risk of replacing the impossibility of performance caused by chance or by the debtor (unless such negligence is gross negligence). A moral obligation, such as the duty to fulfill a promise to join a friend at the cricket training nets on Friday, is not considered a legal obligation; it has no legal significance. Duty arises only from a social agreement or from the dictates of a certain conscience.

[43] Various purchase contract models and agreements to protect buyers and sellers selling cars, inventory and more. In South Africa, it is at the discretion of a court to grant a particular service. In the event that he does not consider a particular service as the most appropriate means, he will not place the order. In the event that performance is impossible or unlawful due to the breach, this remedy will also not be available, and the innocent party may not choose to terminate the contract. In summary, the performance requirements are therefore as follows: public policy requires a balance between two conflicting public interests with regard to trade restriction agreements. On the one hand, contracts freely concluded must be performed (inviolability of the contract); on the other hand, everyone should be free to exercise his profession or business (freedom of trade). A trade restriction agreement is valid and enforceable unless the party seeking to avoid its consequences can demonstrate that the restriction is contrary to the public interest and therefore unenforceable. The restriction denier therefore has the burden of proving that the application of the restriction is contrary to policy. An agreement restricting trade that is contrary to public policy is void but unenforceable. A condition of dissolution is therefore a condition that fulfils an existing obligation at the time the condition is met. Before the fulfillment of the condition attached to the contract, the contract has full legal effect, and either party may require the performance of its obligations by the other party. Once the condition is met, the contract is terminated and it is assumed that it never existed.

The consequence is that each party can claim to be returned to its original position. For example, if Jess doesn`t pass her exams, she has to return the car to Rodney. This breach occurs in cases where one party makes it impossible to perform the obligations arising from the contract. The conditions for such an infringement are as follows: however, those circumstances must have occurred as a result of an unavoidable and preponderant event; the cause must not be the fault of the debtor. In Peters, Flamman and Company v Kokstad Municipality,[214] for example, a company was dissolved during World War I by the Smuts government, which had declared its German owners enemies of the state. As a result, the company was no longer able to fulfil its contractual obligations. The municipality of Kokstad filed a lawsuit for breach of contract, but the judge concluded that due to the higher circumstances, enforcement was objectively impossible (casus fortuitous); the contract should therefore be terminated. The details are therefore the same, mutatis mutandis, as with mora debitoris, which is much more common.

Mora creditoris is a very rare form of violation, the value of which lies above all in its conceptual reflection of its opposite. Because there may be legal requirements to retain certain information longer than the validity period specified in the agreement, a confidentiality agreement may include a provision stating that the agreement will remain in effect as long as the receiving party is required to retain the information. Damages are a primary remedy in the event of breach of contract: a right to compensation for the financial damage suffered as a result of the breach. Damages may be claimed in addition to other remedies. Their purpose, in the event of positive interest or expected damages, is to put the innocent party in the position that would have occupied him if the contract had been properly performed (although the defaulting party is not responsible for the particular consequences that he could not have taken into account when concluding the contract). [166] Negative interest or fidelity damages are intended to place the plaintiff in the position he would have held if he had not entered into the contract at all. Contractual damages can include both loss of expectations and loss of trust. Mora is better defined as “delay without legal excuse to fulfill a contractual obligation or unlawful non-performance”. [153] It therefore refers to the time of performance, in particular non-performance, and is therefore sometimes referred to as a “negative error.” Some general characteristics of the letter as a prescribed formality can be identified: the service can only be provided in several instalments if it is expressly approved or agreed by the parties; otherwise, it must be done completely. The authority for this position goes back to Grotius, with his stipulation that the performance should be in pieces. [184] An illegal contract that is void cannot be performed – this is called the ex-turpi rule – but the illegal part of an otherwise legal contract can be separated from the rest of the contract depending on the likely intent of the parties. If the void contract has been fulfilled, a refund should be granted in principle, but the par-delictum rule prohibits a refund if the parties are also morally guilty.

.